GREG GUTFELD: Liberals in the media are furious because of an irrefutable scientific fact

NEWYou can now hearken to Fox News articles!

All proper. Recently, ESPN Samantha Ponder expressed help for athletes talking out towards organic males who preserve attempting to compete with girls in sports activities. You know, the fellows who preserve placing the meat in swim meet.

a photo of Lia Thomas


Disgusting. Ponder tweeted, “I barely said anything publicly about this issue. And I’ve had so many people message me, stop me in the street to say thank you and tell me stories about girls who are afraid to speak up for fear of lost employment or being called hateful. It’s not hateful to demand fairness in sports for girls.” And she’s proper. That’s logical. That’s honest. It’s based mostly on irrefutable scientific reality. So what occurs subsequent? Well, liberals within the media are livid as a result of, effectively, they’re silly. And what do they do to a girl talking out towards the bullying of ladies? They bully her in fact. Riding in on her broomstick is Nancy Armour, a ghastly sports activities columnist for USA Today – the official doormat for Americans staying at low-priced lodges. If the La Quinta Inn goes out of enterprise, so does she. The God-awful Armour writes, “Don’t be fooled by the people who screech about fairness to cloak their bigotry towards transgender girls and women. This is and always was about hate, fear and ignorance.” 

Well, if you happen to’re speaking about her columns, you could not be extra proper. They suck. This broad accuses Ponder of screeching however she’s not the one leveling unprovable accusations. It appears to me ol’ Nance is projecting like a drive-in theater. How about this gem? “I’m at a loss as to how a transgender woman going to a gynecologist takes anything away from anyone or how it’s any of Ponders business.” 

a photo of Nancy Armour and Samantha Ponder

USA Today columnist Nancy Armour (left) and ESPN broadcaster Samantha Ponder (proper) ((Gutfeld))

Yeah, effectively, the remainder of us are questioning why a transgender lady must go to a gynecologist. Unless she’s affected by jock itch. I’ve been there. But it is like a USA Today author going to see a mind surgeon. What’s to function on? Armour then accuses Ponder of piling on a gaggle that’s already amongst probably the most susceptible in our society. So, who’s she speaking about? Men. She’s speaking about males. See, this is the thought course of. All males are evil proper up-to-the-minute they determine they’re truly girls. 


Then abruptly, abruptly, their rights override all people else’s rights. Especially girls who’ve been girls the entire rattling time. But Nance is a feminine sportswriter, not a younger, superlative athlete – in order that may be the issue right here. Envy, failure, spite. She’s not a winner like they’re, and he or she hates them for it. But I’ll wager Armour nonetheless considers herself a feminist. And I’m not saying that as a result of she seems to be like a younger Pete Rose. 

a photo of Nancy Armour and Pete Rose

But most feminists do not attempt to wreck the careers and lives of different younger girls. And calling somebody a bigot minus any proof is an try to do exactly that. And so Armour simply created a brand new athletic event– throwing girls beneath the bus. Hopefully, a person is driving the bus and can skillfully keep away from hitting them. 


Just ensuring you are awake. Accusations of bigotry are a dime a dozen, particularly from hacks. But it isn’t simply name-calling, it is truly a critical slander for the accusation carries social stigmas that can comply with you on-line ceaselessly. And that is the purpose, is not it? That the specter of the smear will scare you into silence, which is what Armour hopes to do to high-level feminine athletes. Suddenly, pro-women athletes are actually redefined as anti-trans. And what occurs whenever you’re labeled that? Well, simply ask J.Okay. Rowling, whose life was turned the other way up by unhinged, rabid activists. Of course, it is a signal of the weak spot of their argument. Rather than debate, they denunciate, they smear. 


And whenever you assert the apparent – that women and men are certainly totally different and inserting bio males amongst girls shall be unfair in sports activities – they are going to name you a bigot as a result of, effectively, not less than she is a profoundly political, anti-science hack. But screw her and the smears she rode in on. Basic human biology is not going to alter irrespective of what number of cruddy columns Nancy craps out. Terrible writing may be in her DNA, however a Y-chromosome is not. 

Leave a Comment