Does a New Study Give Evidence that the Coronavirus Was Made In a Lab?

Coronavirus Tube
The SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus that causes COVID-19, was first detected in Wuhan, China late final yr.
solarseven/Getty

Scientists in a brand new paper make sturdy claims concerning proof that the COVID-19 virus didn’t originate in nature—the prevailing principle—however as a substitute was made in a lab. According to 6 main specialists in evolutionary biology and infectious illness consulted by Newsweek, the paper provides no new data, makes quite a few unsubstantiated claims and its scientific case is weak.

“This pre-print report cannot be given any credibility in its current form,” says Andrew Preston, an professional in microbial pathogenesis on the University of Bath within the U.Okay.

The paper, “Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route,” is authored by Dr. Li-Meng Yan and three colleagues affiliated with the Rule of Law Society, a gaggle not identified for its work on infectious illness. The Society was based by Stephen Okay. Bannon, the previous Trump advisor not too long ago charged by the FBI for fraud, and Chinese businessman Guo Wengui, who fled China in 2014 on bribery and different costs.

The paper—a pre-print to the web site Zenodo, which implies it hasn’t been via the rigorous peer assessment required to publish in scientific journals—strikes a conspiratorial tone early on, casting the controversy over the origin of the virus as a battle in opposition to censorship of dissenting views and fraud. The authors present no references to assist these claims. To again up their assertion that authors of a Nature Medicine article had undisclosed conflicts of curiosity, they level to an announcement of an award given by China to Dr. Ian Lipkin, an epidemiologist at Columbia, for his work on the nation’s illness preparedness after the primary SARS outbreak. The different reference hyperlinks to a scientist’s C.V.

The scientists Newsweek consulted additionally took challenge with the genomic evaluation of the authors. For occasion, the authors level to “restriction sites” within the genetic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 as proof that the virus was made utilizing enzymes that act as molecular scissors so as to add or subtract genetic materials. But “all DNA sequences in nature have restriction sites,” says Arinjay Banerjee, a virologist at McMaster University, “and it is not surprising that the SARS-CoV-2 genome also has restriction sites. The evidence presented here is anecdotal.”

Banerjee additionally forged doubt on the authors’ assertion {that a} characteristic referred to as a furin-cleavage web site—a part of the virus’ spike protein, which it makes use of to connect to human cells—was intentionally inserted into the virus.

The paper, says Jonathan Eisen, an evolutionary biologist on the University of California at Davis, is “filled with unsubstantiated claims.”

In a tweet, Carl Bergstrom, an evolutionary biologist on the University of Washington in Seattle and co-author of Calling Bullshit: The Art of Skepticism in a Data-Driven World, referred to as the paper in a tweet “bizarre and unfounded.”

Says Preston: “The report is not based on an objective interpretation of the SARS-CoV2 genome. The interpretations made are not supported by data, are unsubstantiated and the interpretations are largely stated but not explained. The report does not appear to start with an open hypothesis about the origin of SARS-CoV2.”

Fred Guterl contributed reporting to this story.

Leave a Comment